The danger during times when we feel like a diminished version of ourselves is that we can naively come to assume or believe that the people who offer to prop us up or help us heal have our best interests at heart. This is seen quite frequently within cults where vulnerable people looking for belonging or a higher sense of meaning to their lives are love-bombed by devotees of the cult leader, while effectively being groomed for membership of something that will prove deleterious to their best efforts at moving productively forward with their lives. While that may appear to be an extreme example, there can also be individuals within our familial and friendship circles who by their own deficit of character or woundedness would be inclined towards facilitating co-dependence or enmeshment with us if they were given the opportunity to be leaned on as a means of support. While no doubt this sounds like a highly cynical take on what motivates some individuals to interject themselves into the challenges that we sometimes face in our lives, I have found that the possibility of encountering these individuals is not to be underestimated.
When we see the world through rose coloured glasses as a consequence of our weakened state of being, we can become too trusting of what others say or how they seek to make us feel, especially if the effect of that would be to numb us to the pain or discomfort that we feel as a consequence of our predicament. While we might long for the temporary relief of this tension or suffering, when we outsource that task to someone who wants to ride in on their white horse to fix our problems from the outside, we unknowingly make the path towards identifying the right actions and solutions that much harder to discern and pursue. Any psychologist or counsellor worth their salt knows this to be true, and when there are avenues of resolution that present themselves to a patient during the process of therapy, they will see it as their task to defer to the patient coming to those realisations themselves, rather than being pre-emptively prescriptive about what they think that person should do in the circumstances. While one could argue that providing these solutions is what a psychologist or counsellor gets paid for, there is also a cost to be borne by the patient, who because they are told what to do are deprived of the opportunity to piece together their own understandings from the broken fragments of meaning that were inherent in the adverse experiences they encountered. And here we have an adversary in the form of a competent psychologist or counsellor appear in the frame again.
I’ve heard it said that if a person finds the therapeutic process to be a pleasurable experience, then they need to seek an alternate form of assistance immediately. Working through our trauma or dysfunction is a naturally uncomfortable and painful experience, and if we are coddled through that process, not only do we risk getting stuck along the journey to healing but we can also retreat into becoming a less resilient and empowered version of ourselves. If someone truly loves us and cares about our flourishing, then this should be the antithesis of what they want for our lives. No doubt, the people who love and care for us the most genuinely have that intention, but they likely don’t have the know how to help us through difficult periods effectively. If that is the case, I think it is better for all involved that they humbly realise their limitations, rather than trying to rush in with a saviour complex to try and fix our problems.
What I’ve observed, especially of late, in the activism space is a pervasive narcissism which manifests in this complex that oftentimes has the counter effect to whatever it is that these activists say they are standing for. Take the current pro-Palestinian protests for example. By focusing their anger and condemnation on the Israeli Defence Forces for the civilian deaths that have resulted from their best attempts at weeding out the scourge of Hamas fighters that still present a threat to Israeli security, these activists are unwittingly fortifying the legitimacy of that brutal terror group whose failures in properly leading the Palestinian territory have been the primary cause of the havoc and suffering wreaked on its inhabitants lives. By deflecting the responsibility (or blame – depending on how one sees it) for what is taking place so that they can identify with the present victims of the conflict, these individuals are in effect enabling the true source of these people’s subjugation. Like fools, they rush in where angels fear to tread.
What the better angels of our nature have to teach us here is the wisdom of enabling nobly (which could otherwise be expressed as ennobling others) and being a formidable adversary to those whose capacities we want to see develop to meet the vicissitudes of life. Personal and collective thriving does not occur if we allow others to indulge the deficits in their character that we call vices. Neither do they cultivate the fortitude to move forward with courage and confidence, if we treat them with kid gloves. In this age of entitlement and victimhood where people are inclined to play that role to garner attention and empathy for themselves, it is worth pausing before we respond to their ‘need’, lest we come to the ill-formed and self-indulgent conclusion that our intervention is necessary for ‘good’ to be done. Those who are truly virtuous don’t have those motives working in the background to orient their behaviour, so we need to evolve beyond our ego to embody the forms of enabler and adversary that can serve others and bring generative life to the world.